Underground mining · Accident prevention

Firedamp gives no warning.
Geophysics does.

Every year, coal mines record sudden gas outbursts, volumetric explosions and cases of asphyxiation, resulting in fatalities, extended production stoppages and losses in the millions.

Degassing, methane sensors and early-warning systems control the gas inside the mine, not its source. The tectonics of the coal-bearing formation are not studied in depth before extraction begins, and mine safety services rarely have the instruments or the methodologies required to assess the risk of high-pressure methane entering active workings through tectonic faults.

Non-invasive · no mine access 98.4% predictive accuracy · Donetsk 2010 2.7 sq mi (7.1 km²) gasodynamic model · Kuzbass 2022
Field evidence · Donbas and Kuzbass · 2009 — 2022

Why in-drift monitoring detects the condition too late.

Schematic cross-section (Figure 5, Kuzbass 2022 study). Select the figure to enlarge it.
01

Geodynamic origin

In addition to the methane originating in the underground workings, Inside Earth detects the methane that migrates under high pressure from deep geological reservoirs (4,920–9,840 ft / 1,500–3,000 m), frequently located beyond the mine boundaries, through tectonic fault systems that act as migration pathways.

02

LEL is not safety

Explosions can occur below 5% methane. Heavy hydrocarbons — ethane, propane, butane — travel with the methane and lower the auto-ignition threshold of the mixture.

03

Instantaneous discharge

When the mantle is breached during extraction, large volumes of gas enter the drifts and headings before conventional sensors register the critical condition.

04

Regulatory gap

The phenomenon is not adequately addressed in the current regulatory framework, nor in the prospecting protocols customarily applied in the sector.

Incorporating this analysis into sector procedures would address a documented gap in current prospecting protocols, at a cost well below that of a single accident.
How it works · on one page

Remote nuclear magnetic resonance, applied to methane.

The same physical principle used to characterize metal deposits and hydrocarbons miles below the surface. The same equipment. A different target fluid.

01

Surface scan

Carried out without contact with the drifts and headings and without access to the mine. Operations are not interrupted.

02

Identification of anomalies

Depth, thickness and pressure of the detected fluid are determined for each anomaly.

03

Mapping of tectonic faults

The routes along which the gas migrates from the deep sources toward the coal zone are delimited.

04

3D gasodynamic model

A deliverable georeferenced in WGS-84 over the concession itself.

Independent validation · real drilling data

Studies carried out: Donetsk 2010 and Kuzbass 2022.

Each case demonstrates something different: Zasyadko, predictive accuracy against real drilling data; Anzherskaya-Yuzhnaya, the operational usefulness of a complete model in an active mine.

Zasyadko · Donetsk · 2010
98.4%

Predictive accuracy. Four horizons of gas-saturated sandstones were confirmed between 1,755 and 5,932 ft (535 and 1,808 m), in direct comparison against the formation-test data of well ZG-1, under a joint protocol signed by the mine's Geological Exploration sub-directorate.

Anzherskaya-Yuzhnaya · Kuzbass · 2022
2.7sq mi

Studied with a complete gasodynamic model. A migratory tectonic fault running southwest to northeast was identified, together with two gas anomalies at operating depth, two high-risk zones and five recommended degassing drill points.

Zasyadko · forecast against drilling, well ZG-1
Horizon Depth forecast · ft (m) Depth drilled · ft (m) Pressure forecast · psi (atm) Pressure measured · psi (atm)
h₁1,785 – 1,916 (544 – 584)1,755 – 1,952 (535 – 595)147 – 294 (10 – 20)235 (16)
h₂3,196 – 3,422 (974 – 1,043)2,972 – 3,346 (906 – 1,020)220 – 294 (15 – 20)1,352 (92)
h₃4,173 – 4,321 (1,272 – 1,317)4,154 – 4,344 (1,266 – 1,324)265 – 294 (18 – 20)
h₄5,751 – 6,093 (1,753 – 1,857)5,886 – 5,932 (1,794 – 1,808)2,204 – 2,351 (150 – 160)2,410 (164)

The most significant indicators were obtained at 5,886–5,932 ft (1,794–1,808 m): a pressure of 2,410 psi (164 atm) and a flow of 50,080 cu ft (1,418 m³) of gas per day. The discrepancies in the determination of horizon depths were deemed acceptable for the practical application of remote-sensing equipment.

Kuzbass · what was found

The southern section is crossed from southwest to northeast by a tectonic fault along which an underground gas flow migrates at 3,840 psi (270 kgf/cm²) from the natural reservoir toward the coal zone, feeding two anomalies at 1,585–1,634 ft (483–498 m) and 1,970–2,000 ft (600–610 m), with pressures of 780–855 and 925–995 psi (55–60 and 65–70 kgf/cm²) respectively.

Kuzbass · what it meant operationally

Two high-risk bands were delimited along the fault boundaries, 660 ft (200 m) wide and 6,560 ft (2,000 m) long. Within them, mining at the depth of the anomalies may trigger instantaneous methane emissions into the active drifts and headings, with auto-ignition of the gaseous mixture and volumetric explosion.

Case study · Anzherskaya-Yuzhnaya · Kuzbass 2022

Delimiting the gas anomalies of highest pressure.

The purpose of the study was to determine and delimit the highest-pressure gas anomalies within the southern section of the Anzherskaya-Yuzhnaya mine (S = 2.7 sq mi / 7.1 km²) by means of geosatellite prospecting methods.

Study objectives
  • Identify and delineate the surface expression of methane gas anomalies across the project area and adjacent zones.
  • Determine the depth, thickness, gas pressure, and spatial extent of the subsurface gas reservoirs associated with the identified anomalies.
  • Map and characterize the regional tectonic fault systems intersecting the mining area that act as migration pathways for deep-sourced methane.
  • Identify and prioritize optimal locations for methane degassing wells based on the distribution of gas anomalies and vertically continuous rock-fracture zones.
  • Develop recommendations for additional gas management and mitigation measures to enhance mine safety in the southern sector, with particular emphasis on areas exhibiting high-pressure methane anomalies.
01 Anzherskaya-Yuzhnaya coal mine (10.3 sq mi / 26.8 km²) and, in orange, the southern section covered by the study (2.7 sq mi / 7.1 km²).
02 Regional tectonic fault with gas migration and the subvertical zone of continuous rock destruction.
03 Deep, high-pressure gas flows, with the boundaries of the local anomalies and the gas deposit.
04 Direction of gas migration from the ГА-1 natural reservoir toward the coal zone.
05 Medium- and high-risk gas zones delimited over the concession, with measurement points A, Б, С, Д and Е.

Select any map to view it at full size.

The scope of the service

From prospecting to an action plan — four deliverables.

01

Mapping of gas anomalies

Georeferenced contours in WGS-84 over the concession, with estimated pressure and thickness for each anomaly.

02

3D model of reservoirs and migratory faults

Volumetric reconstruction of the deep sources and of the migration routes toward the coal zone.

03

Delimitation of high-risk zones

Bands within the concession where the depth–pressure combination requires additional measures.

04

Degassing drill points

Recommended coordinates and depths to extract the gas before it reaches the drifts and headings.

Typical timeframe: three to four months per zone, depending on extent and depth.
The risk calculation

Cost of an event versus cost of prevention.

The cost of an event
  • Loss of life, with humanitarian and compensation consequences
  • Operational shutdown of weeks or months
  • Loss of profit arising from the operational shutdown
  • Investigation and sanctions from the mining regulator
  • Civil and criminal litigation
  • Reputational damage and higher insurance premiums
The cost of preventing it
  • A fraction of the aforementioned costs
  • Amortizable against a single event avoided
  • Defensible before the board, the regulator and the insurer
  • Applicable as a social-licence argument in sensitive territories
  • Traceable: every anomaly detected is documented
Where the cost of failure is asymmetric, preventive prospecting is risk management — not exploration.
Do you operate an underground mine?

Before the next foot of drift or heading,
know where the gas comes from.

Where an operation would benefit from a map of the gas sources and the migration routes prior to excavation, with the high-risk zones delimited and the degassing points located, the feasibility of the concession can be assessed by the Inside Earth technical team in a first meeting, without obligation.

Request technical evaluation See mining case studies